DXP Solutions: The top 8 and how they are replacing the traditional CMS

In many digital operations, the problem is not the technology itself; it is the lack of integration across channels, data, and systems. A user browses the website, engages with campaigns, and returns through a different touchpoint, but the experience does not follow. Interactions fail to connect, data remains fragmented, and the journey loses continuity, directly affecting efficiency, personalization, and conversion.

This scenario is common in CMS-only architectures. While efficient for content management, these platforms were not built to handle journey orchestration, real-time data integration, and personalization at scale. As operations grow, this limitation stops being a minor operational hurdle and starts undermining the company's capacity for digital evolution.

That is the context in which DXP solutions (Digital Experience Platforms) become essential. They act as an integration and decision layer, connecting systems, data, and interactions to enable a more structured approach to managing digital experiences.

Throughout this article, you will understand what defines a DXP, how it differs from a CMS, the available architecture models, their practical benefits, the top 8 platforms available today, and when it makes sense to evolve toward this approach.

Talk to a Dexa expert about DXP solutions

What defines a Digital Experience Platform (DXP) and how it differs from a CMS

A Digital Experience Platform can be understood as an integrated technology architecture made up of multiple systems working in coordination to create, manage, and optimize digital experiences across the entire user journey. Unlike isolated tools, a DXP operates as a central orchestration layer, responsible for connecting technologies and ensuring they operate in sync.

This structure integrates the core components of digital operations, including content management, customer data, marketing automation, analytics, and transactional environments, allowing all of these areas to share information and respond to events in real time. The real value lies not just in integration, but in the ability to turn data into automated decisions that directly shape the experience.

→ From static delivery to a dynamic experience

With this foundation in place, the experience is no longer static; it becomes dynamic and context-driven. Content, interfaces, and flows are adjusted based on behavior, history, and access channel, enabling real-time journey adaptation without the need for constant structural reconfigurations.

This model transforms digital operations into an adaptive, scalable, event-driven system where every interaction can be continuously optimized.

→ The practical difference between CMS and DXP

In practice, the CMS defines what gets published. The DXP defines how, when, where, and to whom the experience will be delivered, taking into account variables such as behavior, context, and journey stage.

This orchestration capability allows companies to shift from a content-centric logic to an experience-centric one, where interactions are continuously refined to drive better outcomes.

This distinction becomes critical in more complex digital environments, where experience directly affects metrics such as conversion rate, engagement, and lifetime value, requiring an architecture capable of integrating data, channels, and decisions into a single unified flow.

Types of DXP solutions: open vs. closed

The main distinction between DXP solutions lies in the architectural model adopted. This choice determines the level of flexibility, ease of evolution, and degree of technology dependency over time. Generally speaking, there are two paths: closed DXPs, built on proprietary suites, and open or composable DXPs, built around API-connected components.

Closed DXPs

Closed DXPs operate as all-in-one suites where all components belong to a single ecosystem. Features such as CMS, automation, personalization, and analytics come pre-integrated, reducing implementation effort. This model enables faster onboarding and more centralized operations with less need for external integrations. On the downside, this same centralization limits flexibility. Companies become vendor-dependent and have less freedom to swap tools or adapt the architecture.

Over time, this can create technology lock-in and make adaptation difficult in scenarios that demand greater customization or specific system integrations.

Open DXPs

Open DXPs follow a modular, API-based logic, allowing companies to assemble their architecture from best-fit tools. Instead of a single suite, operations are built with specialized solutions connected to each other.

This model enables a best-of-breed approach, where each component of the stack can be selected based on business needs. The primary benefit is flexibility; the architecture can evolve continuously without dependence on a single vendor.

That said, this approach requires greater technical maturity, particularly around integration, governance, and system maintenance. The initial complexity is higher, but so is the long-term adaptability.

How to choose the right model

The right choice depends on the company's context. Simpler operations or those prioritizing speed tend to benefit from closed solutions. More complex environments with multiple systems and personalization requirements tend to extract more value from open architectures.

In practice, the market has been moving toward more flexible models. The need to integrate diverse technologies and avoid lock-in has driven the adoption of composable DXPs, especially among companies that treat digital experience as a core strategic priority.

Latest posts:

• Complete Guide to CMS Migration without losing performance
• Headless Drupal or traditional? How to decide and what the impacts are
• SEO Migration: How to redesign your site without losing organic traffic

Key benefits of DXP solutions

As we have seen, adopting a DXP transforms digital operations by introducing an orchestration layer across data, content, and channels, enabling event-driven decisions and real-time execution. The impact is felt both in business metrics and in architectural efficiency.

→ Data unification and a unified view of the user

A DXP consolidates data from multiple sources, including browsing behavior, transactions, and interactions, creating a unified data layer. This reduces silos between systems and allows different applications to operate on the same foundation. In practice, it enables a more accurate read of the user journey, improves data consistency, and supports decisions better aligned with real user behavior.

→ Event-based personalization

Personalization now operates based on events and contextual data, rather than just pre-defined rules. The DXP allows content and interactions to be adjusted based on variables such as recent behavior, history, and access channel. This increases the relevance of each delivery and directly impacts metrics like conversion rate, retention, and engagement, by reducing friction throughout the journey.

→ Multichannel orchestration

A DXP centralizes decision logic and distributes the experience across different channels from a single foundation. This allows web, mobile, email, and other touchpoints to operate in sync. The result is consistent experience execution, with continuity across channels and fewer operational inconsistencies.

→ Architectural efficiency and operational autonomy

By integrating systems and automating workflows, a DXP reduces tight couplings and operational dependencies. This decreases the need for manual interventions and improves architectural efficiency. Beyond that, it gives business teams greater autonomy to operate with more agility without compromising governance, accelerating testing, adjustment, and continuous optimization cycles.

The top 8 DXP solutions on the market

The DXP market is made up of distinct players, each with specific approaches to architecture, flexibility, and focus area. Choosing the right platform depends directly on the company's context, digital maturity, and strategic objectives.

Some solutions stand out for their ability to support complex, high-scale operations.

1. Liferay and its focus on corporate portals

Liferay is widely used in enterprise environments, particularly for building institutional portals, intranets, and relationship platforms. Its focus is on centralizing both internal and external digital experiences, with strong emphasis on governance and integration with enterprise systems.

It excels in environments where the experience must be structured around multiple user profiles and complex workflows.

2. Optimizely and its culture of experimentation

Optimizely's key differentiator is its strong focus on experimentation and experience optimization. The platform offers advanced A/B testing, behavioral analysis, and personalization capabilities, enabling companies to refine their strategies based on real data.

Its core focus is continuous experience improvement, with a strong orientation toward performance and conversion.

3. Sitecore and large-scale personalization

Sitecore is recognized for its ability to deliver advanced personalization at scale, combining content management with robust marketing and automation tools.

The platform positions itself as a comprehensive solution for companies looking to centralize their digital experience and operate with high sophistication in segmentation and campaign management.

4. Acquia (Drupal) and open source flexibility

Acquia, built on Drupal, stands out for its flexible and open approach. Its architecture allows the platform to serve as the foundation for a composable DXP, integrating different tools according to business needs.

The key differentiator lies in the combination of technological freedom, scalability, and vendor independence. This allows companies to build a custom architecture while retaining full control over its evolution.

Drupal also provides advanced content modeling capabilities, multi-site support, and integration with external systems, making it a solid foundation for complex digital operations.

Also read: Not sure which DXP is right for you? Discover the advantages of Acquia

5. Adobe Experience Manager and experience centralization at scale

Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) is one of the most established platforms in the DXP market, especially suited for companies with complex digital operations and a strong marketing orientation.

Its main differentiator is its integration with the Adobe Experience Cloud ecosystem, including analytics, personalization, and campaign automation tools. This enables unified management of the user journey, with full control over content, data, and interactions.

The platform is best suited for organizations managing multiple channels with high content volumes and demanding personalization requirements. It does, however, require significant investment and operational maturity to unlock its full potential.

6. SAP Customer Experience and business process integration

SAP Customer Experience (SAP CX) stands out for connecting the digital experience directly to core business processes such as sales, customer service, and order management.

Unlike more marketing-focused solutions, SAP positions the DXP as an extension of the core business, allowing data and interactions to flow seamlessly across departments. This is especially relevant for companies with complex operations.

It is most commonly adopted by organizations already operating within the SAP ecosystem that want to consolidate data and journeys into a single technological structure.

7. Salesforce Experience Cloud and customer data-driven experiences

Salesforce Experience Cloud extends CRM capabilities to build digital experiences such as portals, communities, and self-service environments.

Its main differentiator lies in the centralization of customer data and the ability to activate that information throughout the journey, creating more contextual experiences. The platform also integrates with other Salesforce solutions such as Marketing Cloud and Service Cloud.

It is a strategic option for companies already using Salesforce that want to expand their digital footprint based on consolidated relationship data.

8. Magnolia and composable architecture with a governance focus

Magnolia positions itself as a composable DXP, allowing companies to build their digital stack by integrating different services.

Its differentiator is the combination of technical flexibility and content governance, offering robust capabilities for content modeling, personalization, and experience management across multiple channels.

It is well-suited for organizations looking to avoid vendor dependency and maintain greater control over the evolution of their digital architecture.

Learn more: Magnolia: Comparison, features, and when to use it

How to evaluate the best solution

Choosing a DXP should not be driven by platform popularity alone, but by how well it fits the company's context. Factors such as complexity of operations, personalization requirements, volume of integrations, and desired level of autonomy must all be weighed in the decision.

In simpler scenarios, closed solutions can be highly effective. In more complex operations, the flexibility of open architectures tends to offer greater adaptability and long-term evolution.

When should you migrate to a DXP?

Adopting a DXP rarely stems from a desire for innovation; it usually arises from an operational necessity. The tipping point comes when the current architecture, typically CMS-centered, starts limiting integration, personalization, and scale.

This scenario unfolds gradually. Systems start operating in isolation, personalization relies on manual processes, and multichannel management demands redundant effort. Over time, these factors stop being minor inefficiencies and start directly affecting conversion rates, agility, and digital evolution capacity.

Signs that the current architecture is no longer enough

• Data fragmentation: browsing data, campaign data, and transaction data are spread across different systems. This makes consolidated analysis difficult and reduces decision-making accuracy.
• Limited or static personalization: the experience relies on fixed rules or basic segmentation. The operation cannot respond to user behavior in real time.
• Inconsistency across channels: each channel operates on its own logic. Users find no continuity in their journey as they move between web, app, email, or other touchpoints.
• Over-reliance on IT: even simple changes require development work. This limits business team autonomy and slows down testing and optimization cycles.
• Difficulty scaling operations: the current architecture cannot keep pace with operational growth, leading to constant rework and increasing technical complexity.

Migration as architectural evolution

Migration to a DXP should not be treated as a full replacement, but as an evolution of the existing architecture. In many cases, the CMS continues as the content foundation while new layers are added to integrate data, orchestrate journeys, and automate decisions.

This approach enables a gradual transition, reduces risk, and preserves existing investments. The company expands its technological capabilities incrementally without disrupting current operations. This is especially relevant in environments with legacy systems or high complexity, where operational continuity is a critical requirement.

Talk to an expert about your project

ROI and metrics for evaluating a DXP

Implementation involves significant investment, making it essential to define clear metrics for evaluating return. Unlike purely technology-driven initiatives, a DXP's impact is directly tied to business indicators.

The return goes beyond operational efficiency; it extends to the ability to generate revenue, improve user experience and strengthen competitive positioning.

→ Performance and growth indicators

Among the most important metrics, conversion rate stands out as one that tends to improve as personalization becomes more relevant and interactions become better aligned with user context.

User retention is also affected, as more consistent and tailored experiences drive higher engagement and reduce churn. This effect is amplified in operations that depend on recurrence, such as e-commerce, digital services, and content platforms.

Another relevant metric is campaign time-to-launch, which tends to decrease as marketing teams gain more autonomy and processes become automated. This allows companies to respond more quickly to market opportunities.

→ Operational efficiency and indirect cost reduction

Beyond growth indicators, a DXP also contributes to reducing indirect costs. Systems integration and process automation cut down on rework, reduce development dependency, and improve team efficiency.

Data centralization also reduces inconsistencies and improves decision quality, avoiding losses tied to poorly targeted strategies or decisions based on incomplete information.

Taken together, these factors contribute to a broader return, one that goes beyond direct revenue and includes structural gains across the operation.

Why is Dexa a reference in DXP solutions?

Implementing a DXP requires building an architecture aligned with business objectives, one capable of integrating systems, structuring data, and enabling consistent experiences at scale. Dexa operates precisely at this intersection, connecting strategy, design, and engineering to deliver solutions that go beyond the technical layer. Our work spans from architecture planning through platform implementation and continuous evolution.

With deep experience in complex projects and strong specialization in technologies such as Drupal and Acquia, Dexa helps companies build integrated digital ecosystems, ensuring performance, governance, and scalability.

Our focus is on structuring digital operations capable of continuous evolution and generating real value from the user experience. If your challenge involves scaling digital experiences, integrating systems, and operating with greater intelligence, the next step is building the right foundation.

Is your digital architecture ready to keep up with your business, or is it already holding you back? Talk to a Dexa expert and discover how to evolve your digital architecture with confidence and a long-term vision.